- ANALYSIS:
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN MEXICO
- Presidential Primary
And Election
Mexico's long-ruling and dominant
political party, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), for the
first time in its 70-year history opened the selection process for its
presidential candidate in a Nov. 7 primary. Francisco Labastida
Ochoa, a former state governor and cabinet official, won the vote by
taking 272 of 300 electoral districts, according to preliminary
results announced by the party. In the process, Labastida was
positioned as the frontrunner for the July 2000 presidential election.
Four candidates ran in the PRI primary.
Roberto Madrazo, state governor in Tabasco, was Labastida's main
challenger. Because of challenges within the party, PRI, the
most powerful party in the last 70 years, became fractionalized.
The main opposition candidates in the
2000 presidential election were Vicente Fox, a former state governor
and president of Coca-Cola de México, who was running for the
conservative National Action Party (PAN), and Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, a
former governor and leader of the left-of-center Democratic
Revolutionary Party (PRD). Neither party had an open primary.
Fox was popular in the north of Mexico, with businessmen and with
Mexico's growing middle-class. Cárdenas' natural constituency was the
urban working class. Fox performed well in polls and Cárdenas
had long been an important voice in Mexico's politics.
The July 2, 2000 national election was
historic on several accounts. Internal
reforms over the past decade have led to significant changes in the
nation's political landscape, dramatically opening up the electoral
process. This was the first time in
Mexico's modern political history that a sitting president did not
choose his successor. Additionally, Mexico had been
undergoing profound social and economic changes. However, The
Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) had held the presidency
uninterrupted since 1929.
Vicente Fox Quesada of the Alliance for
Change Coalition, headed by the National Action Party (PAN), won the
2000 elections with 43% of the vote, beating Francisco Labastida the
PRI candidate who won 36% of the vote. These elections are considered
to have been the most free and fair elections in Mexico's history.
Fox's Presidential term began on December 1, 2000. This election was a
big step for Mexico toward a greater democracy.
After the 2000 presidential election,
many political analysts believed that the PRI's political power was
declining in Mexico. However, the PRI continues to hold the most seats
in both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, with 211 seats in the
former and 60 seats in the latter. Yet, as a result of the 2000
elections, other parties have gained seats and the Congress is more
diverse than ever. In the Chamber of Deputies:
211 seats are held by the PRI; 206 by
PAN; 50 by the PRD;17 by PVEM; and the remaining 16 seats are split
among smaller parties.
In the Senate: The PRI holds 60
seats; PAN holds 46; PRD holds 15; PVEM holds 5 seats; and two smaller
parties each have one of the remaining two seats.
State and local elections have been a
mix of success and defeat for various parties.
State Elections
In 2001, thirteen Mexican states have
scheduled state and municipal elections. The elections began on
May 27, 2001 in the state of Yucatan. Political analysts are
trying to find broad implications in these 2001 state and municipal
elections. Leaders of the National Action Party (PAN), who
succeeded in helping to elect Vicente Fox Quesada President of Mexico
in July 2000, are eager to build upon this victory, while leaders of
the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) hope to rebuild its
political leadership. In recent elections, the PRI has lost 12
statehouses, Mexico City's mayoralty, majorities in the Chamber of
Deputies and the Senate, and the Presidency. At the same time,
the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) is looking to pick up at
least two governorships after it faired poorly in the Mexican
Presidential elections. Its candidate failed to receive even
one-fifth of the votes cast.
See
Table:
Tabasco
(August 5, 2001)
Results from an October
2000 Tabasco election were overturned by a federal court, saying the
elections in the southeast Gulf state were fraught with errors. New
elections were held on August 5th under careful watch of election
monitors. Manuel Andrade, the PRI candidate was declared the
winner of the overturned October vote, but Enrique Priego was declared
the winner of the August 2001 vote.
Chiapas
(October 7, 2001)
Mexico's former ruling
party, the PRI, won the majority of local municipal and congressional
races during the elections in the southern state of Chiapas. The
state election commission reported that the PRI won 72 out of 118
mayorships and 21 of 40 local congressional seats. The PRD won
20 mayorships and two legislative seats, while the PAN, which governs
the state of Chiapas, won 11 mayorships and one legislative seat.
Landmark
Elections: July 2000
On July 2, 2000, Mexico
held the most transparent and fair elections in its history and the
US-Mexico Chamber of Commerce (USMCOC) was there to witness it.
The Chamber led a delegation of ten business representatives, headed
by President Albert Zapanta, who were invited and credentialed as
official observers by Mexico's Federal Electoral Institute (IFE).
The results of the
election are another milestone in Mexico's forward movement in
becoming a modern democracy. While the election result will
promote a cascade of changes in the way Mexican citizens look at
government and governance, the most important change is that now
Mexicans know that their vote counts. Recent reforms and changes
gave momentum to the feeling that this time the voice and will of the
people would be heard and heeded. And it was.
The delegation
concurred that the elections were a watershed event in Mexico's
political history. They were trailblazing not only because they
marked the first time in 71 years that a president from a party other
than the PRI has been elected, but also because the elections were
peaceful and judged by the international community, and most
importantly, by Mexicans to be fair. Although there were some
minor glitches, the elections were as fair and free as could have
been. The Mexican electorate showed enthusiasm, hope, and
patience in voting, with waits of two-to-three hours to vote in some
places. This did not discourage the people from voting.
The
Electoral Process
The IFE was responsible
for organizing not only the elections for president, but also those
for the Chamber of Deputies, one-third of the Senate, the mayoralty of
Mexico City, as well as state and local elections. Thousands of
candidates, representing eleven parties were vying for these
positions. The IFE recruited over three million volunteers and
set up 113,424 voting stations throughout the country's 300 electoral
districts to accommodate the 58,789,209 registered voters.
The delegation
witnessed the voting routine, which generally went as follows.
First, a voter was required to show his identification card to
election officials, who proceeded to check that the identification
card number corresponded to the number and picture in the election
register. The voter then was given color-coded ballots
corresponding to each of the elections, i.e. for president, congress,
etc. The voter then went on to cast his or her vote in a
curtained booth that allowed for full privacy. It should be
noted that election observers were in a position to see whether the
voter in fact cast one ballot, since the ballot boxes were
transparent. The rationale behind having transparent ballot
boxes is to avoid the accusation of past practices of ballot box
stuffing. Finally, the voter had his or her election card
checked and indelible ink put on his or her thumb. The latter
was done to ensure that no one attempted to vote more than once, a
common accusation in previous elections.
The first round of
counting the votes was done at the local polling sites, with IFE
officials tabulating and party representatives monitoring. The
results were then posted on the doors of the voting station and the
ballots delivered to a district office, where the results were put
into a computer. The district head offices fed the polling data
it collected to four separate computers to ensure against any failures
as experienced in a previous very close election. On the basis
of an IFE calculation referred to as a "fast count"
President Zedillo was able to announce that the Coalition for Change
candidate, Vicente Fox Quesada was the winner of the presidential
race. According to the final tally, of the 37,103,466 votes
cast, Mr. Fox got 42.54% of the votes, followed by PRI candidate
Francisco Labastida with 36.07% and Chautemoc Cardenas of the PRD with
16.65%.
Congress
and Multi-party Democracy
In the race for
Congress, the Partido Accion Nacional (PAN) increased its numbers
in both the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate. However, the
PAN did not win enough seats to win a majority in Congress, although
they now have the plurality, in conjunction with the Coalition for
Change member Green Party (PVEM). This circumstance will force
the PAN to have to build alliances with the political opposition; an
exercise that many believe will further strengthen Mexico's democracy
and assure the long-term sustainability of legislative initiatives.
Landmark
Elections: July 1997
Mexico City's voters
for the first time in recent history elected their own mayor, Cuauhtémoc
Cárdenas, who was inaugurated Dec. 5, 1997. Candidates throughout the
country also contested six state governorships, the entire 500-seat
Chamber of Deputies, and a quarter of the 128-seat Senate during a
July 6, 1997, vote. The elections resulted in a significant political
setback for the PRI, which has dominated Mexico's political scene for
nearly seven decades. Opposition parties captured the Mexico City
mayor's post (PRD) and two state governorships (both PAN). In
addition, the ruling party failed to maintain an absolute majority in
the Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of Congress (the PRI holds
239 seats, the PRD 125 and the PAN 121; the remaining 15 are held by
the PVEM and PT).
Since the election,
four opposition parties have used their combined majority to elect a
leader from the left-of-center PRD and take control of 32 of the 61
legislative committees in the Chamber of Deputies. The opposition's
new-found power did not derail President Zedillo's budget proposal for
1998. The 1999 budget proposal, however, met stiff opposition and was
only passed at the last minute, Dec. 31, following a marathon
legislative session. The final deal eliminates phone taxes outlined in
the president's proposal but includes $1.4 billion in spending cuts,
higher taxes on business and the top earners and higher import tariffs
on goods from countries that do not have a free-trade deal with
Mexico. The agreement, forged between the PAN and the PRI, maintained
the 1999 fiscal deficit target at 1.25 percent of gross domestic
product.
September 2001
|