|
Trade headaches
forwarded to North
Texas firms
03:28 PM CST on
Tuesday, December
20, 2005
One in an
occasional series
By KATHERINE YUNG
/ The Dallas Morning
News
LONG BEACH, Calif. –
Last October, the
nation's freight
network got a rude
wake-up call when 50
ships lay anchored
off the coast here,
each forced to wait
a week to drop off
its holiday goods.
The logjam had
nothing to do with a
strike or work
slowdown. Instead,
an unanticipated
surge in imports
from China meant
there weren't enough
rail and dockworkers
on hand. Now, with
the peak season
looming, officials
with the ports of
Los Angeles and Long
Beach – which handle
two-thirds of the
trade coming through
the West Coast – are
hoping to avoid
another debacle.
This time around,
terminal operators
and railroads have
hired thousands of
new workers. Last
month, imported
containers began
moving off the docks
in four days or less
instead of five. And
hundreds of trucks
started picking up
cargo on nights and
weekends for the
first time.
These steps could
help avert a traffic
jam this fall. But
major shippers worry
that the efforts
won't be enough in
the long run to
avoid a congestion
crisis that could
endanger the economy.
"We have to be more
visionary and more
long-term solution
oriented," said
David Walker,
executive vice
president of
logistics and
allocation for Fort
Worth-based Pier 1
Imports, which this
year will buy more
than half a billion
dollars worth of
merchandise,
primarily from the
Far East.
Like other companies
in North Texas and
elsewhere, the home
furnishings retailer
has taken steps to
protect itself,
sending more cargo
to less-congested
ports.
Some businesses,
such as Dallas-based
Vought Aircraft
Industries Inc., are
finding other
logistical ways to
weather bottlenecks.
But as the tidal
wave of clothes,
furniture and other
items from China
mounts each year, a
once-adequate
infrastructure for
moving freight from
Southern California
to the East now
finds itself
strained.
Without improvements,
the outcome could be
disastrous, some
experts fear. If
ports and railroads
become as clogged as
some of the busiest
U.S. highways, an
economy increasingly
dependent on China
trade may suffer.
"Transportation is
now embedded in the
very fabric of our
economy as never
before," Jeffrey
Shane,
undersecretary for
policy at the U.S.
Department of
Transportation,
warned earlier this
year. "Bottlenecks
in the supply chain,
if left unaddressed,
will have far more
serious economic
consequences than
ever before."
Albert Pierce,
executive director
of the Transpacific
Stabilization
Agreement, a group
representing 13
container shipping
lines, puts it more
succinctly: "We have
major problems."
At current
productivity and
growth levels, North
American ports and
the rail systems
that serve them will
be severely
congested by 2020,
said M. John
Vickerman, a
principal at
TranSystems Corp., a
transportation
services firm. And
by 2010, he predicts,
75 percent of 16 key
U.S. ports will be
struggling with
severe capacity
problems.
Avoiding gridlock
won't be easy. Cargo
bound for the U.S.
from China has grown
an average 34
percent annually
since 2002. By 2020,
the Los Angeles and
Long Beach ports are
expected to handle
35 million 20-foot
containers, nearly
triple last year's
figure.
Adding to the
pressure, West Coast
ports are trying to
cope with new
megaships, giant
vessels that can
haul 8,000 or more
20-foot containers.
These boats require
bigger docks, taller
cranes and longer
berths, not to
mention extra days
to unload cargo.
Ports with limited
room for expansion
aren't the only
worry. Complicating
matters is a
national shortage of
20,000 truck drivers
that could soar more
than five-fold by
2014. Trucks will be
hauling 13 billion
tons annually by
2016, up from last
year's 9.8 billion
tons, predicts the
American Trucking
Associations.
Other options
At Vought, last
fall's traffic jam
delayed parts that
the firm had ordered
from Japan and South
Korea by two to
three weeks. To get
customers' orders
filled on time, some
Vought employees had
to work overtime and
on weekends, a cost
borne by the firm.
This year, the
supplier of wings,
fuselage
subassemblies and
other airframe
structures is using
a large freight
forwarder to deliver
the parts. It's
betting that using
one big firm instead
of several
forwarders will mean
faster service if
gridlock develops
again.
"If we get the
notifications [of
any interruptions]
early enough... we
should be OK," said
Jim Diemicke,
Vought's freight
manager of material
factory support.
Other companies,
like Pier 1, are
shifting more of
their shipments away
from Southern
California to less-congested
ports on the Gulf
and East Coasts, via
the Panama Canal.
Pier 1 is also
making greater use
of Washington's Port
of Tacoma, where its
decorative pillows,
rugs and other
products leave by
rail for
distribution centers
in Chicago and
Columbus, Ohio.
But this kind of
solution doesn't
work for everyone.
Many companies, such
as Mary Kay Inc.,
have discovered that
Los Angeles and Long
Beach remain the
most cost-efficient
way to bring Asian
imports into the
country.
The Addison-based
direct seller of
cosmetics looked at
alternatives to the
Southern California
ports earlier this
year. Last fall's
traffic tie-up
forced it to ship
some bottles,
lipstick base and
other materials to
its Dallas
manufacturing plant
by air freight, a
costly alternative.
Mary Kay is now
sending a few
containers through
the Panama Canal to
the Port of Houston,
where they are
placed on trucks
headed to Dallas.
But already, it
estimates, this
route will cost 18
percent more and
take two weeks
longer than going
through Los Angeles
and Long Beach.
At the Southern
California ports, "there's
going to be more
pressure with larger
volumes," said Ted
Tobolowsky, Mary
Kay's director of
transportation,
logistics and
customs compliance.
"They have to be
more efficient, and
they have to use
technology more."
To keep ahead of the
seemingly endless
flow of containers,
terminal operators
at the Long Beach
and Los Angeles
ports are making
lots of changes.
Pier 400, which was
built on 500
sprawling acres of
asphalt and rock at
the Port of Los
Angeles, is
undergoing a
technological
transformation.
Thanks to bar-coded
routing passes and
optical character
recognition cameras,
truck drivers roll
through the
terminal's entrance
at 45 mph instead of
inching along in
long lines. They
pour through the
exit gates without
having to talk to a
single clerk. The
streamlined process
has reduced drivers'
turn time by 12
minutes.
Out on the docks,
global positioning
systems and radio
frequency
identification tags
will soon instantly
pinpoint the
location of every
container.
More productive
Boosting
productivity has
become an urgent
mission throughout
the Southern
California port
network because so
little room exists
for expansion. And
any project can take
years to complete
due to the
environmental
permitting process.
At 270 berths, Los
Angeles can add only
20 percent more land,
and Long Beach could
expand by 30 to 40
percent at best,
said Art Wong, a
spokesman for the
Long Beach port.
"We are going to
reach the limit of
how much land we're
going to have here
in the next 10 to 15
years," he said.
The ports and
terminal operators
aren't the only ones
scrambling to become
more efficient. The
Burlington Northern
Santa Fe and Union
Pacific railroads
are working
furiously to move
increasing amounts
of cargo more
rapidly over their
networks.
Asian imports are
breathing new life
into these giant
railroads, once seen
as holdovers from a
bygone
transportation era.
At the Port of Long
Beach, half of all
cargo winds up on
trains headed east.
To handle the influx
of containers, the
railroads have added
hundreds of
locomotives and rail
cars, increased the
lengths of their
trains and run more
nonstop service
between Los Angeles
and the Midwest and
Southwest.
For example, some of
BNSF's Los Angeles-to-Chicago
trains are no longer
stopping at Clovis,
N.M., to sort cargo,
saving 24 to 48
hours of transit
time.
The Fort Worth-based
railroad has also
cut in half, to 24
hours, the amount of
time containers can
sit in its yards.
And it's adding
3,600 container-stacking
slots, 400 parking
spaces and eight
cranes to its Hobart
intermodal container
transfer facility in
Los Angeles.
"We're creating more
capacity by becoming
more efficient,"
said Frederick
Malesa, BNSF's vice
president of
international
intermodal.
But the railroad is
also looking to the
future. It's already
planning to open a
new intermodal yard
near the Port of Los
Angeles in 2009.
Railroad's revamp
Meanwhile, Union
Pacific, the
nation's largest
freight railroad, is
borrowing lean
management
techniques from
Toyota Motor Corp.
to weed out
inefficiencies.
Since April, it's
been redesigning its
network to enhance
productivity and
speed. Containers
that used to sit in
its yards for up to
72 hours must now be
moved within 48.
Union Pacific also
continues to build a
second track along
its popular 760-mile
Sunset Route between
Los Angeles and El
Paso.
"You rarely go
through a peak
shipping season
without something
happening. But so
far, so good," said
Paul Borseth, Union
Pacific's assistant
vice president of
international
intermodal.
Like BNSF, the
railroad plans to
beef up its
operations in
Southern California.
It aims to double
the size of its
intermodal rail
facility near the
Long Beach and Los
Angeles ports. It's
currently expanding
the site's support
yard so it can hold
more rail cars.
But trade with China
is growing so fast
that even these
measures may not
ward off further
congestion. That's
why a group of 50
shippers, the
Waterfront Coalition,
have banded together
to call for a
national freight
transportation
policy.
The coalition is a
member of a Maritime
Administration
advisory committee,
which plans to issue
recommendations by
year-end to the U.S.
secretary of
transportation, said
Robin Lanier, the
coalition's
executive director.
Other discussions
are also taking
place. Earlier this
year, executives
from Pier 1 and a
few other companies
met with
Transportation
Department officials
to talk about the
situation at the
ports.
"The globalization
of world markets is
going to continue,"
said Pier 1's Mr.
Walker. "The other
areas of the world
are truly focused on
10, 15, 20 years
out. We don't seem
to have that same
focus. That's a
major obstacle that
we have to overcome."
|